Marketing agencies make it a priority to identify the nation’s regional brand tastes — why people choose Coca-Cola over Pepsi, or Ford over Chrysler — in one part of the country over another. While the volumes of marketing research can point to the brands that are held in high regard in a given state — and why — much can be determined about a state’s preference from something as simple as its Google search history.
A review of search results through Google Trends reveals some fascinating regional differences in search popularity for the nation’s largest brands. Relative to other states, people are far more likely to search for McDonald’s in Illinois than in North Carolina. Similarly, California residents are much more interested in Sony than in Nokia. Based on Google search index results of the most well-known companies in the country, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed the most popular brands in each state.
Click here to see the most popular brand in each state.
The most popular searched brand in a state is not the most searched brand. Rather, it is the brand with the most searches relative to other states (as indicated by a Google search index value of 100). Another brand might have more searches within the state, but not the highest search volume relative to other states.
Based on Google search index results, there appears to be several distinct reasons for a population to search for a brand in much higher volume than in the rest of the country. One, as might be expected, has to do with the regional use of a product. Southwest Airlines, for example, is the most popular brand in New Mexico, a state located in a part of the country the airline serves frequently. In Ohio — a state with eight division I college football teams and at least six professional sports teams — ESPN is the most popular brand.
In other cases, the regional popularity of a brand can be the result of something as simple as a major factory or a corporate headquarters. In Michigan, Ford is the most popular brand. This fact is not surprising given that the automaker is headquartered in Detroit. Arkansas’s most popular brand, Wal-Mart, is also headquartered in Bentonville. Bud Light is the most popular brand in Missouri, the original home of Anheuser-Busch.
In some cases, however, the reasons for a brand to have a very high search score in a given state is impossible to determine. For example, there is no easy answer as to why residents of Kentucky search for Microsoft’s Xbox brand — relative to the state’s total search volume — more often than in any other state.
In many cases, it may be that people are searching not for the brand itself but for something that shares the brand’s name. For example, in Colorado, where Pepsi is the most popular brand, the high volume of searches may be related to Denver’s 18,000+ capacity Pepsi Center, home to the Denver Nuggets and Colorado Avalanche. The Time Warner Cable arena in Charlotte may also explain North Carolina’s relative high volume of Time Warner Cable searches.
People are likely searching for many of these brands because they are interested in learning specific information about them or want to shop for their products. A review of this list, however, reveals that some of these brands might be popular because of how people use Google search. More than one-fifth of the most popular brands are frequently accessed sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Netflix, and eBay. For whatever reason, it could be that individuals in those states are searching for these sites rather than navigating straight to them.
To identify the most popular brands in each state, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed Google’s measure of search interest in each state for the 12 months through September 2015 for 209 well-known brand names. Data was retrieved from keyword search tool Google Trends, which provides an index value for the volume of searches for any given keyword. The most popular brand in a given state is the one with the highest index value. Google’s measure of search interest is based on the number of queries for a given keyword in the state divided by the total Google search queries. This value is indexed and normalized to account for the highest point of interest for the period. If more than one brand had an index of 100 (the maximum value) in a given state, the brand with the highest nationwide search volume broke the tie. Search volumes were collected from Google AdWords keyword planner.
Read more: The Most Popular Brand in Each State – 24/7 Wall St. http://247wallst.com/special-report/2015/10/21/the-most-popular-brand-in-each-state/#ixzz3qwUjsohN
Follow us: @247wallst on Twitter | 247wallst on Facebook
Twitter Targets Brands With Its New Analytics Hub
In keeping with the trend of expanding its analytics capabilities, Twitter is catering to its advertiser base with Twitter Brand Hub. It is designed to track conversation in real time and gather data on tweets that mention their brand and products.
Currently available to select big-name brand advertisers and medium-size businesses, the service is intended to examine audience responses to large campaigns. “Brand Hub helps advertisers quickly understand their brand’s share of conversation, key audiences, and trends about their brand’s conversation,” Twitter wrote in a blog post. “This 360-degree, real-time view gives the brand the opportunity to learn, take action, and see the impact of their initiatives on Twitter.”
Twitter has also created a new feature called TrueVoice, which will “help advertisers track their share of conversation in real time.” TrueVoice will indicate what percentage of people are talking about the brand in question—along with how much chatter belongs to rival companies.
As Twitter continues to augment its internal analytics tools—including making that data available to users—it makes sense that it would offer detailed metrics to brands, a service that many advertisers are likely paying for elsewhere. What remains to be seen, however, is whether Twitter can provide meaningful information that will actually help brands improve their campaign strategies; up until last year, the company didn’t even open up its analytics dashboard to non-advertisers.
Golden Mic | Ted Cruz, GOP Presidential Candidates Bash Biased Media
Republican presidential candidates – led by an agitated Ted Cruz – tore into CNBC’s moderators in the latest GOP debate, issuing the sharpest attacks on the mainstream media of the 2016 election cycle.
Sen. Cruz accused the moderators of trying to instigate a cage match, Sen. Marco Rubio called the media a super PAC for Hillary Clinton, and Donald Trump slammed the “ridiculous questions.”
The candidates took to the airwaves following the debate and continued to rip CNBC for the tone and substance of the debate. And in the days ahead, sources said, campaign representatives will air their grievances to the Republican National Committee.
The campaigns found a sympathetic ear in RNC Chairman Reince Priebus, who blasted CNBC t for asking “gotcha” questions and said the network “should be ashamed.”
The candidates’ attacks on the media were red meat for the conservative base, which already has a deep mistrust of the mainstream press. But even by conservative standards, the candidates’ broadsides were aggressive and unrelenting, and delighted the audience in Boulder, Colo. The Spin Cycle’s take on the CNBC moderators, are they came to the debate with a decidedly biased agenda – a stark contrast to the media’s treatment during the Democratic debate. For that, Ted Cruz and the GOPers get a Golden Mic & CNBC gets a Short-Circuited, Tarnished, Biased Mic!
Each week, The Spin Cycle will bestow a Golden Mic Award to the person, group or company in the court of public opinion that best exemplifies the tenets of solid PR, marketing and advertising – and those who don’t. Stay tuned – and step-up to the mic! And remember … Amplify Your Brand!