The United States ranks last in media trust — at 29% — among 92,000 news consumers surveyed in 46 countries, a recent report found.
That’s worse than Poland, worse than the Philippines, worse than Peru. (Finland leads at 65%.)
The annual digital news report from the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at Oxford also found some improvement in trust in nearly all the countries surveyed – probably thanks to COVID-19 coverage – but not in the U.S. where the low rating was flat year to year.
One explanation, though not necessarily the only one, is the extreme political polarization in the U.S. This study, like many others, found extremely high levels of distrust – 75% of those who identify as being on the right thought coverage of their views is unfair.
Local news, both print and broadcast, fared better than national news. However, the findings for struggling local print outlets were not all good.
Interest in local news and willingness to pay for it was not strong. Only 21% in the U.S. said that they pay for news online. Of those who do, 31% said they pay for The New York Times, 24% for The Washington Post and only 23% for the site of a local or regional paper.
The most popular local news topic, by a wide margin (62%), was weather. Staples of local newspaper coverage like politics (33%) and education (16%) lagged. Those surveyed indicated a preference for local broadcast (52%) as a source over newspapers (16%).
What definition of trust is being used? And what strategies could U.S. news outlets pursue to improve the situation? Researchers at Poynter received answers from Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, director of the institute and one of the authors of the report.
“We leave it to the respondent to define what trust means for them,” Nielsen wrote, “and ask a general question about trust in news, without specifying means of delivery. The term is intuitively meaningful to people, at least we have never had anyone query it.”
The basic survey question is, “I think you can trust most news most of the time.” Follow-ups show that users give a higher trust rating to news they themselves consume and a lower rating to news on social media.
Nielsen suggested three potential solutions to the low trust level in the U.S:
“Many Americans do not feel that news organizations are covering people like them fairly, and those who say the news media are treating them less fairly are less likely to trust the news. This includes, for example, younger people (young women, in particular), Black Americans and Hispanic Americans.”
More inclusive treatment of their concerns will help, he said, with the qualifier that change in trust will take a while given how long these groups have felt left out.
“Political partisans, especially on the right, trust the news much less and also do not feel news organizations cover their views fairly. News media may be able to respond to this concern.
“The question is what compromise that might entail on, for example, calling out unsubstantiated allegations of election fraud. And how would any attempts to appeal more to those on the political right, often older white Americans, combine with attempts to appeal to younger and more diverse audiences, who are often more liberal? It is a clear option, but there may be trade-offs and choices here.”
Interestingly, partisans, including conservatives, at least say that they prefer a range of views (74%) and neutral treatment of issues (66%) rather than reports that just reinforce their views.
“Third, just one in five Americans identify going directly to a news site or news app as their main way of getting news online, underlining the weak connection news media have with much of the public. As we have shown elsewhere, trust is often in part about familiarity. It’s hard to see how news media can win people’s trust if they often have only a few, fleeting points of contact with them, frequently mediated by social media, an environment people generally do not associate with trustworthy news.
“The work, however good, does not speak for itself if people rarely see it. At least for those parts of the media where people’s opinion of the brands in question would improve if they got to know them better, based their perception more on personal experience and less on stereotypes or cues taken from often highly partisan voices, it seems to me some of the U.S. news media have, basically, a communications and marketing problem.”
The study validates other often observed problems publishers face:
There is a sizable cohort now who avoid news altogether; either they don’t have time or find it depressing.
A larger percentage (51%) is “not concerned” about the financial circumstances of the media compared to 31% who say they are aware the business is less profitable than it used to be.
Marriott Debuts New Ad Campaign as Travel Surges
As we continue to emerge from the pandemic, travel is starting to surge again, another rite of a return to normalcy.
The travel industry again is taking flight, and so too is ad spending. Recently, Marriott debuted “The Power of Travel,” its biggest global campaign ever, as the hotel chain tries to take advantage of surging interest in travel. The brand is also testing new marketing channels to attract new customers to its properties.
A 30-second spot shows a host of different activities and locations around the world. “We are not here on this planet to close our eyes to the world,” a woman’s voice says, as a male voice chimes in, “We are here to go out and experience its many wonders.”
“Travel has the power to shape our world,” the spot continues, “make us whole again.”
In addition to spot, Marriott will feature two interactive out-of-home storefronts in Manhattan in collaboration with Pinterest. The company, which has 30 hotel brands, will also promote the campaign on TikTok, a first for Marriott. The hotel chain is also working on shoppable collaborations with Hulu and HBO Max, and will host “How to Travel Better,” an editorial series on its Marriott Bonvoy Traveler platform. Marriott first introduced Bonvoy in 2019 as a rebrand of its rewards program, despite criticism, the term has stuck.
Spiked Mic: Beer Brands ‘Hop’ into Ice Cream
Major brewers are icing down much more than beer this summer – skipping to the ice cream aisle for new ways to keep customers refreshed.
Coors is the latest to enter the field with a boozy twist on a classic creamsicle: Coors Seltzer’s Orange Cream Pop ice cream, a limited-edition flavor made and sold in collaboration with Tipsy Scoop, a New York-based ice cream shop specializing in liquor flavors. The dessert, 5% alcohol by volume, will soon be available in stores and online through Tipsy Scoop, starting at $12.25 per pint or $49 for a 4-pint pack.
Coors is joining Bud Light Seltzer Frozen Icicles and Truly Lemonade Freeze Pops as brands seek to expand their flavors and products beyond the hard seltzers that have become trendy in the past few years.
Now that’s something to “hop” about!
Each week, The Spin Cycle will bestow a Golden Mic Award to the person, group or company in the court of public opinion that best exemplifies the tenets of solid PR, marketing and advertising – and those who don’t. Stay tuned – and step-up to the mic! And remember … Amplify Your Brand!